Recurring remaster.
Moderators: sunny, runcible, MODLAB
Recurring remaster.
Having bought the original when it came out ,has anybody compared it to the remaster and is it noticably superior to warrent buying again ,I must say I thought it sounded mighty fine to start with,but wouldn`t like to think I was missing out on something.
-
- Known user
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:43 pm
- Location: Elfr, Ranafylke, søndre Vika
Re: Recurring remaster.
I want to know as well..
kind of guessing it´s mastered for cd/perhaps cleaned up and not the modern "remastering" which sometimes means newly mixed? (and usually fails as often as it´s successful)
kind of guessing it´s mastered for cd/perhaps cleaned up and not the modern "remastering" which sometimes means newly mixed? (and usually fails as often as it´s successful)
"the greatest example of self-violation in the history of art"
-
- Known user
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
- Location: The corners where the idiot children call
Re: Recurring remaster.
Not much in the difference. I'm working from memory and haven't compared the two side-by-side, but I would say that there may be a bit more clarity and sparkle in the remaster, but if so it's not much. It's certainly not compressed to within an inch of it's life.
If you want to support SpaceAge, or if your original is shot to bits, of if you want the new artwork (or all three in my case ) then buy it.
If you want to support SpaceAge, or if your original is shot to bits, of if you want the new artwork (or all three in my case ) then buy it.