The Guardian
Moderators: sunny, BzaInSpace, runcible, spzretent
The Guardian
online now, and also feature in the Sun on Friday - http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/ap ... CMP=twt_gu
Re: The Guardian
Best SH,SL interview yet. Will grab my boss's copy of The Sun tomorrow and (If someone can tell me how), try and get a scan posted here.
-
- Known user
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:15 am
- Contact:
Re: The Guardian
That's a great interview.
-
- Known user
- Posts: 4876
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
Re: The Guardian
good interview.
but some of the comments are horribly spiteful whats with people?
but some of the comments are horribly spiteful whats with people?
Re: The Guardian
I'm getting fed up with reading how he premiered the new album in the Royal Albert Hall. Sorry London media, but us lucky folks in Edinburgh had that pleasure. Long live the Queens Hall
-
- Known user
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:07 am
Re: The Guardian
There's some horrible fuckers commenting there like lol hmmmm, does J have Hep C? I very much doubt it. I work with people with Hep C and they ain't never seemed as reinvigorated as Jason is seeming at the moment. Horrible shit houses sound like they WANT him to have Hepp C! pffffttt lol
Anyway it's brilliant interview.
Anyway it's brilliant interview.
Re: The Guardian
Short Irish Times review here: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/the ... 70830.html
Nineteen...Nineteen...Six Five
-
- Known user
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 10:48 am
Re: The Guardian
The anonimity of the internet and a social atmosphere of "all that matters is ME, MY wants, MY opinions, MY tastes, MY satisfaction" seems to afflict most sites allowing comments.angelsighs wrote:good interview.
but some of the comments are horribly spiteful whats with people?
-
- Known user
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:29 am
- Location: newquay
- Contact:
Re: The Guardian
nice article ,maybe the best so far in this blizzard off publicty, read a few comments and gave up ,
Re: The Guardian
Between E*****t T**e , and half the comments in the Guardian ,I`m bemused as to where all the negative attitude too Spiritualized is coming from-scratch`s head -away for the best part of 4 years ,and yet they raise this ire in some folks ,at a loss really
Re: The Guardian
My main problem with the Guardian article is the headline they chose - as well as the few lines below it. Even the Sun presented it better!
Nothing wrong with the interview itself, definitely some interesting stuff in there, and I guess most people who posted negative comments didn't even bother reading past the first 2-3 paragraphs.
Nothing wrong with the interview itself, definitely some interesting stuff in there, and I guess most people who posted negative comments didn't even bother reading past the first 2-3 paragraphs.
Re: The Guardian
i've had Hep C, been treated and cleared it . . . sounds like it to memusicheals2 wrote:There's some horrible fuckers commenting there like lol hmmmm, does J have Hep C? I very much doubt it. I work with people with Hep C and they ain't never seemed as reinvigorated as Jason is seeming at the moment. Horrible shit houses sound like they WANT him to have Hepp C! pffffttt lol
Anyway it's brilliant interview.
Re: The Guardian
The Guardian print another less complimentary review of SHSL,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/ap ... ght-review
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/ap ... ght-review
Re: The Guardian
The Guardian and Sun interviews are a bit "Used To Be In Evil Gazebo" aren't they?
(Half Man Half Biscuit fans will know what I mean. That's both of us)
(Half Man Half Biscuit fans will know what I mean. That's both of us)
Re: The Guardian
Sunday Times 'awarded' SHSL 'dud of the week' unfortunately
Re: The Guardian
That Guardian review was pretty poor. To describe SHSL as more of the same is a pathetic critique. A bit like saying that you were disappointed with the new ACDC album because it sounded like the last one, or would Mr Monet paint something other than Water Lillie's please....
It would be nice to see the thing reviewed on its merits. The reviewer had a half decent point about the cliches, but then seemed to give up to focus on petty point scoring.
It would be nice to see the thing reviewed on its merits. The reviewer had a half decent point about the cliches, but then seemed to give up to focus on petty point scoring.