Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

For new sounds, old sounds and favourite sound discussion...

Moderators: sunny, BzaInSpace, runcible, spzretent

Post Reply
BzaInSpace
Site Admin
Posts: 3864
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
Location: HELL

Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by BzaInSpace »

O P 8
Kurious Oranj
Known user
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:56 am

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by Kurious Oranj »

SEPTEMBER 10, 2007
BzaInSpace
Site Admin
Posts: 3864
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
Location: HELL

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by BzaInSpace »

AND?

Never been posted here before, has it?

Sent to me as an email recently and I had a chuckle.

So, you gonna troll over all my posts 'cause I offended - on your behalf - The Mighty Noel?

Christ - you deserve his music pal. See you on the other side.
O P 8
Kurious Oranj
Known user
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:56 am

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by Kurious Oranj »

you sound really mad
jadams501
Known user
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 2:51 am

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by jadams501 »

BzaInSpace wrote:AND?

Never been posted here before, has it?

Sent to me as an email recently and I had a chuckle.

So, you gonna troll over all my posts 'cause I offended - on your behalf - The Mighty Noel?

Christ - you deserve his music pal. See you on the other side.
I've been chanting dark spells to The Mighty Noel that he haunts your dreams with his indelible hooks. With any luck, you'll wake up every morning humming The Masterplan.
radioshack
Known user
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by radioshack »

More importantly on that web link, I'm highly disturbed that Justin Bieber is infact a 51 year-old paedophile!

Sure makes a lot of sense though!
alan_cohaul
Known user
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:52 am

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by alan_cohaul »

Hahaaa......I give the Onion a 10.0!!
One Asian Under A Groove
Known user
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
Location: Accrington

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by One Asian Under A Groove »

"I've been listening to music for over 30 years, and it's consistently some of the best stuff out there."
I literally laughed out loud!
scratch
Known user
Posts: 714
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Elfr, Ranafylke, søndre Vika

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by scratch »

Bah!
I thought it would be about old music not this new crap by the same name!

Everything had already been done on bone flutes by the start of the neolithic period.
From 5000 bc up until now it has just been copycats.
We stole it from the neanderthals btw.. although that is arguable since all non sub-saharan "humans" are hybrids with 2-4 % neanderthal genes.
"the greatest example of self-violation in the history of art"
alan_cohaul
Known user
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:52 am

Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8

Post by alan_cohaul »

scratch wrote:Bah!
I thought it would be about old music not this new crap by the same name!

Everything had already been done on bone flutes by the start of the neolithic period.
From 5000 bc up until now it has just been copycats.
We stole it from the neanderthals btw.. although that is arguable since all non sub-saharan "humans" are hybrids with 2-4 % neanderthal genes.
You should see people drive around here--this is where their genetics really get revealed. I'd say that they're about 90 percent Neanderthal!
Post Reply