Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
Moderators: sunny, BzaInSpace, runcible, spzretent
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
- Location: HELL
-
- Known user
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:56 am
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
SEPTEMBER 10, 2007
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
- Location: HELL
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
AND?
Never been posted here before, has it?
Sent to me as an email recently and I had a chuckle.
So, you gonna troll over all my posts 'cause I offended - on your behalf - The Mighty Noel?
Christ - you deserve his music pal. See you on the other side.
Never been posted here before, has it?
Sent to me as an email recently and I had a chuckle.
So, you gonna troll over all my posts 'cause I offended - on your behalf - The Mighty Noel?
Christ - you deserve his music pal. See you on the other side.
O P 8
-
- Known user
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:56 am
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
you sound really mad
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
I've been chanting dark spells to The Mighty Noel that he haunts your dreams with his indelible hooks. With any luck, you'll wake up every morning humming The Masterplan.BzaInSpace wrote:AND?
Never been posted here before, has it?
Sent to me as an email recently and I had a chuckle.
So, you gonna troll over all my posts 'cause I offended - on your behalf - The Mighty Noel?
Christ - you deserve his music pal. See you on the other side.
-
- Known user
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 6:03 pm
- Location: Glasgow
- Contact:
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
More importantly on that web link, I'm highly disturbed that Justin Bieber is infact a 51 year-old paedophile!
Sure makes a lot of sense though!
Sure makes a lot of sense though!
-
- Known user
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:52 am
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
Hahaaa......I give the Onion a 10.0!!
-
- Known user
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 1:00 am
- Location: Accrington
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
I literally laughed out loud!"I've been listening to music for over 30 years, and it's consistently some of the best stuff out there."
-
- Known user
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:43 pm
- Location: Elfr, Ranafylke, søndre Vika
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
Bah!
I thought it would be about old music not this new crap by the same name!
Everything had already been done on bone flutes by the start of the neolithic period.
From 5000 bc up until now it has just been copycats.
We stole it from the neanderthals btw.. although that is arguable since all non sub-saharan "humans" are hybrids with 2-4 % neanderthal genes.
I thought it would be about old music not this new crap by the same name!
Everything had already been done on bone flutes by the start of the neolithic period.
From 5000 bc up until now it has just been copycats.
We stole it from the neanderthals btw.. although that is arguable since all non sub-saharan "humans" are hybrids with 2-4 % neanderthal genes.
"the greatest example of self-violation in the history of art"
-
- Known user
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 12:52 am
Re: Pitchfork rates Music at only 6.8
You should see people drive around here--this is where their genetics really get revealed. I'd say that they're about 90 percent Neanderthal!scratch wrote:Bah!
I thought it would be about old music not this new crap by the same name!
Everything had already been done on bone flutes by the start of the neolithic period.
From 5000 bc up until now it has just been copycats.
We stole it from the neanderthals btw.. although that is arguable since all non sub-saharan "humans" are hybrids with 2-4 % neanderthal genes.